I do not, however, believe it falls under improvised weapon status (the staff is specially made and listed at the same weight as a quarterstaff, after all) I do not, however, believe it falls under improvised weapon status (the staff is specially made and listed at the same weight as a quarterstaff, after all) And, yes, if it is a mundane quarterstaff, the unarmed strikes will be better starting at level 6 (for overcoming damage reduction for non-magical weapons), but if the quarterstaff is magical in any way (even a +1 quarterstaff), the weapon continues to outshine the unarmed attack in every way. Spear Dancing Spiral allows any ability that works with a quarterstaff to also be used with any spear or polearm.

Considering that no major historical armies really used the staff over the spear on a battlefield there is no question as to which one is superior the spear.

Spear v Quarterstaff with the 5e monk : DnD. However, just going back about 180 years we find a still living staff fighting tradition in the North of Sweden, among the Sami, called “Skalastet“. But I am not denying that the basics that one uses in quarterstaff can be transcribed to pole arms (pole axes, bills, lances, partisans and halberds). ... Quarterstaff Fighter. A quarterstaff (plural quarterstaffs or quarterstaves), also short staff or simply staff is a traditional European pole weapon, which was especially prominent in England during the Early Modern period..

If they move they'd take booming blade damage, plus if they come into range I'd attack for 1d8/10 with a bonus 1d8/10 piercing damage. r/DnD: A subreddit dedicated to the various iterations of Dungeons & Dragons, from its First Edition roots to its Fifth Edition future. Why does a mediocre Halberd when the Spear is better in every way and cheaper to boot. I know there are some weapons in this game that are simply just better than others weapons, but it seems to be balanced out by how much they cost (giving a reason why the weaker weapons exist, they're cheaper). Cloud Hands Blog Taijiquan Qigong Home Quarterstaff vs sword - Part 1|3 - What many people don't realize is that, while the quarterstaff was a good weapon and definitely was used to a good extent, it was only a weapon of necessity.

As nouns the difference between quarterstaff and staff is that quarterstaff is a wooden staff of an approximate length between 2 and 25 meters, sometimes tipped with iron, used as a weapon in rural england during the early modern period while staff is (plural staffs or staves) a long, straight stick, especially one used to assist in walking. That way it would be about the same length as a spear, according to wikipedia a hoplite spear was 7–9 ft. (2–2.75 m) and they were using shields as well. A quarterstaff is not usable as a focus (it was not specially made for that purpose), but a focus staff is usable as a quarterstaff.

In addition, it is possible to apply the Polearm Master feat, which makes you use your bonus action to make an extra attack. And, yes, if it is a mundane quarterstaff, the unarmed strikes will be better starting at level 6 (for overcoming damage reduction for non-magical weapons), but if the quarterstaff is magical in any way (even a +1 quarterstaff), the weapon continues to outshine the unarmed attack in every way. The quarterstaff in it's current form is weapon suited for wizards. So, I contend that the quarterstaff gets a raw deal. I'm really not clear on what you think is different about using those abilities with a spear now that the errata is out vs using them with a quarterstaff before the errata came out, why would using a spear now give a reaction when using a quarterstaff before wouldn't? When using either the quarterstaff or spear as a Monk weapon, do you still gain the unarmed bonus action from Martial Arts if using 2 hands(1d8)? This means a quarterstaff wielded in one hand would be used pretty much as a blunt (and probably not very effective) spear. Quarterstaves utilize a variety of slows, microstuns, knockbacks and gap closers to harrass their opponents. I can easily see why a lesser skilled armored opponent would be defeated by a quarterstaff fighter. I haven't seen any historical evidence of a quarterstaff fighter against an armored opponent. Quarterstaff, a staff of wood from 6 to 9 feet (about 2 to 3 m) long, used for attack and defense.It is probably the cudgel or sapling with which many legendary heroes are described as being armed. Taijiquan Staff Aikido Jo Do Karate Shaolin Sticks Wudang. User account menu. The quarterstaff has some advantages over the longsword; it is visually nonthreatening but can be just as deadly, and will even be more dangerous to an armored person than a longsword. Quarterstaff Master allows a quarterstaff to be wielded as a one-handed weapon. The biggest difference is not a characteristic of the staff itself, but rather the relationship to the practitioner. A quarterstaff is literally a stick that maybe had metal bands attached to it.